Mobilisation, Action, Solutions and Peaceful Resistance.
We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.
11th September 2001. Though this issue is a decade old, it is still as important as the day it happened. I feel it my duty to ensure the public has a full spectrum of understanding of the lies, manipulation and blatant disregard for the value of human life demonstrated on this day. Even if you are not American, the ramifications of this are of global concern.
This moment in history has been used to install fear, guilt, anger, and misguided hatred; while the TRUE culprits are praised and rallied behind. I guess what I am asking you to do is, in the face of overwhelming evidence, approach this without any prejudice.
“I can think of no faster way to unite the American people behind George W. Bush than a terrorist attack on an American target overseas. And I believe George W. Bush will quickly unite the American people through his foreign policy.”– Henry Kissinger, CNBC, Dec 13 2000
19 Hijackers, directed by Osama Bin Laden, took control of 4 commercial airliners with box cutters and, while evading the Air Defence System (NORAD), hit 75% of their targets.
World Trade Towers 1, 2 and 7 collapsed in a “pancake” fashion as a result of structural failure through fire, while the plane that hit the Pentagon vaporised upon impact, as did the plane that crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania.
The 9/11 Commission found that there were no warnings for this act of terrorism, while multiple government failures prevented adequate defence.
It is first important to understand the meaning of the term False Flag attack. The term originated from the military concept of flying false colours, that is, flying the flag of a country other than one’s own. There are a slew of false flag operations documented in history, including Operation Himmler: a Nazi Germany false flag attack to establish the Polish as an enemy and justify the invasion of Poland. Or the Oklahoma City bombing. Or the U.S.’ proposed: Operation Northwoods, a series of projected, self-inflicted sabotages to be blamed on Cuba to garner public and international support for their invasion.
Put simply; a self inflicted wound to manipulate public perception into supporting an agenda.
“The easiest way to gain control of the population is to carry out acts of terror. The public will clamour for such laws if their personal security is threatened.” – Joseph Stalin
It is an old tactic throughout history. If you have opposition you simply demonise them by creating your own crisis, your own massacre or terrorist bombing or incident, and then blame it on your political opponents.
“I find it interesting the iconography of an image that you won’t forget, that’s seared into your brain forever. It’s something that I always lust for. I’m always looking to find images that will represent to people the experience they had when they see it. There was something about a 747 having crashed and been completely destroyed in an upscale neighbourhood that I couldn’t resist.”
-Steven Spielberg speaking about filming War of the Worlds
The most familiar scene on September 11th, 2001 is that iconic image of the jets colliding with World Trade Centres 1 and 2. The world stood awestruck as this undeniably powerful image was plastered across every news network. Phrases such as “Terrorism”, “9/11”, “the War on terror”, “Osama Bin Laden” and “Al Qaeda” were repeated ad nauseam on every television and in every newspaper;,, ingrained into the minds of the viewers as their eyes widened, mouths dropped and brains shut down. Repetition is used because it is understood if people hear something enough times then they eventually believe what they are told. To the impressionable, susceptible public, these catch-cries and iconic images provoked a desired, elicited response. Upon this response, all reasonable logic bypassed conscious thought; which, thus, caused their instinctual responses to kick in.
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
-Joseph Goebbels, Reich Minister of Propaganda in Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1945
“The greatest social messages are promoted through the fixation of emotive sequences – not logical, factual sequences, but pushing points across in an emotional way which register and fix in the mind. So emotional content is very important. Rather than go through an argument using actual logic and facts, there are no debates. And when you are being downloaded your guard is down, the sensor part of your brain is not in action, it isn’t saying “yes I agree with this” or “I agree with that” as you would in a debate or a lecture – you are actually in an alpha state being completely downloaded with new ideas.”
Author, radio announcer and
Researcher into the causative forces behind major changes in historical development
The flicker rate of the television alone is designed to put you in a lower brainwave state; between an alpha and theta. This leaves you in a dreamlike state where you are unavoidably influenced through propagandised deliveries and subject to manipulation. Brain wave patterns can be read, studied and used to discern between normal states of consciousness and hypnotic states. It has been shown just 30 seconds of television is enough to induce alpha waves in the brain, which indicates torpid (almost comatose) rates of activity. TV is very powerful for propaganda, marketing and advertising.
Let us first analyse the manner in which the world trade centres fell. The official theory is they collapsed in a “pancake” fashion into their own footprint as a result of structural failure through fire. So we are made to believe the floors weakened by the aeroplane strikes, coupled with fires sufficiently hot enough to melt steel, caused these floors to break loose from the steel columns, obliterate the steel columns and collapse atop one another with no resistance at the rate of free fall. Do you recognise the implausibility?
In a “controlled burn” (where oxygen and fuel are regulated in an optimal mix) jet fuel will only burn at a maximum temperature of 1800°F (982°C), which is still not anywhere near the temperature needed to weaken the steel sufficiently enough to bring down an entire building. Yet such high temperatures were reached that molten metal was found at the site for over 3 months after September the 11th.
Imagine, though, for a second that the fires were hot enough and the floors did fall atop one another, naturally we would expect to see all 110 stories piled atop one another, with 47 steel core columns still standing upright. Had the floors detached from these columns, each column would still be standing a thousand feet! However they were pulverised along with the floors. This seems bizarre as in actual fact the towers were “built to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707 hitting at any location,” and “probably could sustain multiple impacts of jet-liners.”
This incongruity aside, the rate of free fall in which these buildings fell does not account for structural failure through fire. Fires, by nature, crawl. Fires burn in localised areas. As they spread, the previous area dissipates; you need only watch a material on fire for evidence of this. They move about.
The rate of freefall on Earth is 9.8 m/s/s. The North Tower collapsed at 8+ seconds, while the South Tower followed at 10+ seconds (or +/- 10 stories per second). For a building to fall at the rate of gravity it must collapse without encountering any resistance. Had you dropped a penny from the top of the building it would have fallen at an equivalent rate. For the floors to encounter NO resistance, the fires would have had to burn with an even distribution, not crawling, which defies the characteristics of fires.
So how did the 47 steel columns vanish? How did they all “fail simultaneously so the core disappeared”? How did the buildings manage to collapse into their own footprint? The collapse of the North and South towers exhibit none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, while exhibiting ALL the characteristics of a controlled demolition.
The term controlled demolition is self-explanatory; the destruction of a building in a controlled, intentional manner using well-placed explosives. Controlled demolitions take weeks to prepare at minimum and are designed to:
1. Fall neatly, with a rapid onset of collapse
2. Collapse symmetrically
In controlled demolitions, to ensure the buildings fall in on themselves the core columns are cut diagonally. Through this method the vertical support is lost and the buildings implode without damaging neighbouring buildings.
Authorities quickly removed all remaining structural beams, however, and further evidence (including the missing bodies of 1200 victims) was hurried away too.
Because controlled demolitions cannot be hastily organised, nor carried out on a whim, Building 7 is often referred to as the “smoking gun” in this whole conspiracy. Building 7 is consistently ignored by the average person, and the 9/11 Commission Report does not even pay it heed or attempt to explain it by simply omitting it from their report altogether.
Over 6 hours after WTC 1 and 2 collapsed, World Trade Centre 7 – a 47-story sky-scraper situated 2 blocks away – also miraculously, vertically fell at free-fall. It was not struck by any aeroplane, and any damage it sustained was through fires caused by superficially hit debris when 1 and 2 fell. The fires in Building 7 were relatively small and short lasting. However, in spite of this, the decision was made to “stop manual fire-fighting efforts fairly early in the day” as there was “limited water on site”.
It is important to note the ONLY 3 steel frame buildings ever to be brought down due to structural failure through fires – in history – all occurred in New York on September 11th, 2001. It is conspicuous that other skyscraper fires in history have exhibited far more extensive and long-lasting personalities than Building 7’s, though none of these collapsed.
The very idea that jet fuel burning is what caused the structural collapse of WTC 1 and 2 is absurd. Aside from fuel not reaching high enough temperatures, the significant majority was incinerated in the initial collision. Did you see that giant plume of fire rise into the air?
After that fireball dispelled, the remaining fires would have been office desks, computers, water coolers etc. Are we to believe these materials burned hot enough, and long enough, to cause any severe loss of structural integrity? Think about it.
Prior knowledge of Building 7’s collapse is very pronounced. BBC TV reported WTC7 had fallen 23 minutes before it had. It can literally be seen in the background as the reporter is announcing it. As well as this, hundreds of emergency rescue personnel were told over bullhorns that Building 7 was about to be “pulled” and a 20-second long radio countdown preceded its collapse.
Video footage of the WTC7 collapse shows evidence of a wilfully coordinated and highly-destructive demolition. The central columns are seen to cave in on themselves, as the left and right sides fall inwards. As we established earlier, a controlled demolition is NOT an impromptu decision that can be made off the cuff in 6 hours. They require advanced rigging with special destructive devices, which, of course, raises the question: “If building 7 was brought down intentionally, were not 1 and 2 subject to similar action? And then would they not have taken weeks to prepare and organise?”
To “pull” a building, in demolitions industry terminology, means to demolish a building.
On 9/11: “We’d had such terrible loss of life; (we thought) maybe the smartest thing to do is “pull it”. And they made that decision to “pull”, and we watched the building collapse.”
-Larry Silverstein, Leaseholder, World Trade Centre.
After 9/11, the Silverstein Group profited $7.1 billion after filing TWO separate insurance claims for maximum amount of policy, based on the two, in Silverstein’s view, separate attacks. Silverstein happened to purchase the lease for the WTC 6 months prior to the attacks on September 11th, despite the fact they were degenerate, requiring some $200 million in renovations and improvements. “From an economic standpoint, the trade centre – subsidised since its inception – had never functioned, nor was it intended to function, unprotected in the rough-and-tumble real estate marketplace.”
“It was well-known by the city of New York that the WTC was an asbestos bombshell. For years, the Port Authority treated the building like an aging dinosaur, attempting on several occasions to get permits to demolish the building for liability reasons, but being turned down due the known asbestos problem. Further, it was well-known the only reason the building was still standing until 9/11 was because it was too costly ($15 Billion) to disassemble the twin towers floor by floor since the Port Authority was prohibited legally from demolishing the buildings.”
Indeed the buildings were designed with asbestos fireproofing. When the buildings collapsed, a huge cloud of pulverised debris rained down on the vicinity below. First response and recovery workers were ensured by the Environmental Protection Agency “the air was safe to breathe”, however subsequent findings by The Office of Medical Affairs for NYFD reported severe lung damage and reduced lung function in a study of over ten thousand fire-fighters, emergency medical technicians, and cleanup crews who worked at the WTC site.
Other studies indicate workers and residents who returned to areas which had been reopened as “safe to the public” were potentially exposed to dioxin concentrations “nearly 6 times the highest dioxin level ever recorded in the U.S.”
BYU Physics Professor, Dr. Steven Jones, of St911.org, has clearly expounded the scientific reality that thermite was used to bring down the World Trade Center. Upon combusting, thermite reaches temperatures where it will cut through steel like a knife through butter.9 All three buildings displayed “pools of molten metal.” For well over 6 weeks after the collapse, hot spots of over 2000° F (1093° C) were documented in the debris. That is 500° F hotter than jet fuel even burns.
The presence of molten metal was also ignored by the official reports, despite a shroud of controversy which followed after its discovery. Dr. Steven Jones also found the patented brand of thermite, “Thermate”, which is recognisable by its high sulphur content and is commonly used in the demolition industry.10
If we can set aside all that, there is also the matter of the identification of the hijackers. Of the 19 hijackers, each plane supposedly carried 4 – 5 each. The story, of course, is that they did not force their way onto the planes but were regular, ticketed passengers. I would assume their names be present on the flight manifests (released under the freedom of information act), however “none of their names, nor any Arab names whatsoever are present”.
Evidence appears to be laid out on purpose for the FBI to follow. It almost plays out like an Easter Egg hunt. Whether it is Mohamed Atta’s bags which miraculously were not loaded onto the aircraft and which outlined details of all the hijackers as well as other incriminating evidence. Or whether it was the intact passport discovered on the floor near the world trade centers, which phenomenally fell out of Satam Al Suqami’s pocket, “flew through the fire ball, through the side of the plane, and came down to the ground unscathed.” This was widely cited as proof, until the hijacker in question turned out to still be alive.
In fact, 6 of the alleged 19 hijackers purportedly aboard the planes are still alive to this day.
“I couldn’t believe it when the FBI put me on their list. They gave my name and my date of birth, but I am not a suicide bomber. I am here. I am alive. I have no idea how to fly a plane”
-Abdulaziz al-Omari, The telegraph, 23 September, 2001
The FBI did not revise their list when confronted with this evidence. In truth, the hijackers were not even linked to Osama Bin Laden. Osama Bin Laden’s own FBI ‘Most Wanted’ profile never directly connected him to 9/11 because there was “no hard evidence” to suggest such an accusation.
Putting aside the fairytale that was his death, just who was Osama Bin Laden? Mainstream media would have us believe he was the founder and leader of al-Qaeda, the terrorist organisation responsible for 9/11. Despite living in Saudi Arabia, the U.S. began invasions in Iraq and Afghanistan. Magically, he managed to remain in hiding during 3 U.S. presidential administrations, despite being the most wanted man in the world, until his official death; murdered on May 2, 2011.
It is a well-known fact the Bin Laden family has close ties with the Bush family. “George Herbert Walker Bush made trips to Saudi Arabia in 1998 and 2000 to meet with the Bin Laden family on behalf of the Carlyle Group.” On the morning of 9/11, G. H. W. Bush also met with Osama’s older brother, Shafiq Bin Laden in an annual Carlyle Group investor conference. The Carlyle Group is a private defence equity firm – with offices in Washington D.C. – which has made notable profits as a result of the invasions of Aghanistan and Iraq. Both the Bush and Bin Laden families were major investors in the Carlyle Group.
Bin Laden was a CIA asset who, before 9/11, toured the United States and U.S. military bases in search of political support and armaments under his assigned name ‘Tim Osman’., He was suffering Marfan Syndrome, and receiving regular kidney dialysis treatments before September 11th. The average life expectancy for someone undergoing kidney dialysis treatments is four years. How was it he managed to survive for over a decade?
Steve Pieczenik, a State Department official in three different administrations and an award-winning Harvard Medical School luminary, told The Alex Jones Show on May 4, 2011, that the alleged raid on Bin Laden’s compound was nothing more than a fable because Osama had already been dead for the best part of a decade.
The government was waiting for the “most politically expedient time” to roll out his corpse. It is interesting to note the outlying circumstances taking place at the announcement of his death. Bin Laden was killed at a time when President Barack Obama’s approval rating was very low. Upon news of Bin Laden’s death, his approval reached the “highest point in two years – 60 per cent – and more than half of Americans now say he deserves to be re-elected”. He was also announced dead around the time of the core meltdown of Fukushima, Japan and during NATO’s immoral bombardment of Libya, serving as a distraction from these and other real issues. Was this not a “politically expedient time”?
During the man-hunt, “failure to provide proof” that Bin Laden was connected to 9/11 “was seen to be unnecessary” due to a video admission “allegedly found in Afghanistan”. This admission of responsibility was “widely cited as proof, however the man in the video has darker skin, fuller cheeks and a broader nose than the Osama bin Laden of all other videos. We again seem to have planted evidence”
“Obama to Osama-deniers: ‘The fact is, you will not see bin Laden walking on this Earth again.’
‘Fact is,’ no one’s seen him for 10 years!”
-Gerald Celente, American trend forecaster and author.
At 9:37, September the 11th, the west wall of the Pentagon was hit by hijacked American Airlines Flight 77, a Boeing 757 piloted solely by Hani Hanjour – as contended by investigators. Hani Hanjour obtained a commercial pilot’s license in April 1999, how he managed to do so remains a mystery to FAA officials (Federal Aviation Administration).
According to Flight Academy staff members, his level of competency for piloting a plane was scary at best. He was reported to the aviation agency in February 2001 after instructors at his flight school in Phoenix had found his piloting skills so shoddy and his grasp of English so inadequate that they questioned whether his pilot’s license was genuine.
“I’m still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon,” a former employee said. “He could not fly at all.” With this in mind, it is reasonable to wonder HOW on Earth Hanjour was able to hit a direct target at over 750 kilometres an hour in P-56 (Protected Air Space 56), which covers the White House and the Capitol.
“The speed, the manoeuvrability, the way that he turned, we all thought in the radar room, all of us experienced air traffic controllers, that that was a military plane,” O’Brien said. “You don’t fly a 757 in that manner. It’s unsafe.”
– Danielle O’Brien,
Air Traffic Controller at Washington Dulles Airport on 9/11
Before crashing into the Pentagon, Flight 77 (weighing 80 tons) performed a complicated, rapid 270° downward spiral, flying almost a complete circle and descending 7,000 feet in two and a half minutes. When and if it did hit, the wreckage of the plane, along with seats, luggage and bodies, was supposedly vaporised because of the heat, leaving nothing but bricks and limestone. Flight 77 had 2 Rolls-Royce engines made of steel and titanium alloy, weighing 6 tons each. How are we to believe the plane was vaporised by Jet Fuel when that is only possible at 11,000°F and when jet fuel burns at a maximum 1800° F under highly controlled conditions.
That implausibility in mind, it makes no sense for fires which vaporised a jet to leave remnants of finger prints and DNA. However, 184 of the 189 Pentagon fatalities (64 of which were passengers on the aeroplane) were identified by their DNA in “the most comprehensive forensic investigation in U.S. history!”
Shortly after the strike, debris was carried off by government agents, and the entire lawn was covered in dirt and gravel, so that any remaining forensic evidence was literally covered up. Over 80 recordings of security footage from video cameras, which would show what hit the pentagon, were immediately confiscated by agents of the FBI and Department of justice still refuses to release them. With the massive debate concerning the incidence of a plane crash, you would think they would be more than happy to release these videos. Though to this day only several still images have been made available, which, again, and rather tragically, show no indications of an aeroplane.
Even if you were to believe the official story up to this point, the hole left in the Pentagon is not big enough to account for the wing span, the tail section or the two 6-ton jet engines. And the path of destruction does not justify a plane having crashed there.
“My brain could not resolve the fact it was a plane because
It only seemed like a small hole in the building.
No wings. Nothing.”
-Steve DeChiaro, eyewitness
“It was a very loud, quick whooshing sound. I was convinced it was a missile.
It came in so fast it sounded nothing like an airplane.”
-Lon Rains, eyewitness
Is not an essential component of a plane crash the presence of an actual plane? Apparently we have found another anomaly. This was nothing more than a smoking hole in the ground masquerading as the debris of a crashed aeroplane.
What an actual plane crash consists of:
·1 A crashed plane
·2 Debris (seats, chassis, wings, engines)
·3 Strewn Luggage and bodies
·4 Impact crater
·5 Burning chassis, the wreckage. A plane.
What Flight 93’s crash consisted of:
·2 Scrap metal
·3 Lies perpetuated by mainstream media
There is absolutely NOTHING to distinguish a plane crashed there. Were they not told, I guarantee most would assume otherwise.
“It looked like somebody just dropped a bunch of metal out of the sky. It looked like someone took a scrap truck, dug a 10-foot ditch and dumped trash into it. I stopped being coroner after about 20 minutes, because there were no bodies there. I have not, to this day, seen a single drop of blood. Not a drop.”
-Wally Miller, Somerset County Coroner
A plane does not simply vaporise when it crashes, leaving unrecognisable debris big enough you could pick up with your hand.
This is an aerial photograph of the crash site from 1994, (from the Microsoft Research Maps website, courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey.) The scar (which many proponents of the official story claim is where the wings collided) is present 7 years prior, albeit missing the smoking bomb crater, which could easily be created through an explosive.
The 9/11 Commission found that there were no warnings for an impending terrorist attack, while multiple government failures prevented adequate defence.
“Nobody in our government at least, and I don’t think the prior government, could envision flying airplanes into buildings…” –George W. Bush, April 13th, 2004
At least 12 counties warned the U.S. regarding intelligence about an eminent attack on America. There were in fact 28 advanced intelligence warnings altogether. CIA Director George Tenet warned Condoleezza Rice on July 10, 2001, that “the system was blinking red,” meaning that there could be “multiple, simultaneous“ al-Qaeda attacks on U.S. interests in the coming weeks or months.
If warnings of an imminent attack were so severe then how is it “no-one” in the “government could envision flying planes into buildings,”? Why is it Condoleezza Rice could not “predict they would use a plane as a missile,”?
In fact, in the 2 years before 9/11, NORAD conducted exercises using hijacked airliners as weapons, and one subject included the World Trade Centers. “These exercises tested track detection and identification; scramble and interception; hijack procedures; internal and external agency coordination and operational security and communications security procedures.”
“What if they had been so deliberately confused that they couldn’t respond?”
As well as these precautionary drills before the fact, on September 11th, the date itself, NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command) was conducting “A number of conflicting war game exercises that involved the insertion of false radar blips” including one scenario which characterised flying planes into buildings.
In the first few days, military officials said that no fighter jets were sent up by NORAD until after the strike on the Pentagon at 9:38, even though signs that Flight 11 had been hijacked were observed at 8:15. “Standard operating procedure states if FAA Flight Control notices anything that suggests possible hjacking,” they are to scramble fighter jets immediately. Although interceptions “usually occur within 10 minutes, in this case over 80 minutes had elapsed before any fighters were even airborne”. This story suggested that a “stand-down” order had been issued.
In 2000, NORAD had 67 interceptions with 100% accuracy. On September 11th 2001 there were multiple failures in NORAD’s prevention of commandeered planes. In May of 2001, by presidential order, Vice President (at the time) Dick Cheney was handed direct control of all war-game and drill operations. On the morning of 9/11, Cheney was in charge of all NORAD orders from the command bunker under the White House.
On October 26th, 2001, the USA PATRIOT Act was introduced, literally standing for ‘Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism’.
This act exceedingly intrudes on the civil liberties of American citizens with such executive orders as:
1. Secret FBI and police searches of your home and office without your knowledge;
2. Secret government wiretaps on your phone, computer, and Internet activity;
3. Secret investigations of your bank records, credit cards, and other financial records;
4. Secret investigations of your library and book activities;
5. Secret examinations of your medical, travel and business records;
6. Freezing of funds and assets without prior notice or the right to appeal;
7. The creation of secret “watch lists” that ban or restrict those named from air and other travel activities. There are well over a million people on this list.
The war on terror that has emerged since 9/11 is manufactured and engineered. The story is far different from the one you are being told by the newspapers, the media and by the politicians. You may have noticed it shifting its focus to patriots and returning veterans and the like. This, as well, is not by chance.
How do they get away with it? How are they implementing their agenda of systematic control? They do so through incremental changes so as not to arouse any suspicion. Put basically, when you make a big leap towards something (as Hitler did in Nazi Germany for example), you are faced with a backlash of angry citizens. However, if you incrementally execute tyrannous proceedings while slowly influencing everyone to be subservient, submissive and obsessed with pop culture through scientific and well-researched methods of manipulation, people are unable or unwilling to fight back.
It sounds ludicrous, and it is! Somewhere along the line the masses got it in their minds that governments do not lie, or that governments don’t meet behind closed doors and plot like the conniving liars they are. That is ALL they do! If a neighbour lied to you as much as the government did, you wouldn’t trust them. You wouldn’t let them watch your kids. So why do we continuously give them the benefit of the doubt? I call for radical changes in our own minds to think more, pay attention to what is occurring around us and re-educate ourselves and those around us. I call for the defeat of the fluoridated, dumbed-down mentality we have all fallen victimto through innutritious foods, pop-culture fixation and corporate propaganda.
Open your eyes. Realise what is occurring and break your conditioning! Until you are aware, you will never truly realise the surplus of information available that you do not know! Or realise the incredible positivity that you can experience when you know exactly how you are being manipulated, and BREAK FREE. This knowledge is power, ignorance is NOT strength to say that is ‘double speak’; evasive, ambiguous, high-flown language used deliberately to deceive or confuse.,
“The evils of tyranny are rarely seen but by him who resists it.” – John Hay, 1872
The information I have outlined here is not withheld from the public – it is widely available – it is just not written in the script served to you on the 6 o’clock News. Though ever-increasingly, the mainstream media is being compelled to touch upon such issues to stay relevant! This is because the majority of people have abandoned the bullshit, mainstream, corporate-controlled news for the more unbiased, factual and comprehensive alternative sources. The mainstream media has NO CHOICE but to touch on these issues due to overwhelming pressure from the public – whose knowledge of this conspiracy and the bigger picture continues to rage on. You need only look at applicable polls conducted on major news networks, or their ever-decreasing ratings, for evidence of this. The sheeple are waking up and switching to the truth. We are the majority.
Their whole power is in our acquiescence!
Please visit http://www.ae911truth.org/, a non-profit conglomerate of over 1,500 non-partisan architects, engineers and affiliates dedicated to exposing the falsehoods and to revealing truths about the “collapses” of the 3 World Trade Centre high-rises on September 11, 2001. Their evidence and vast, pertinent knowledge seek to dispel misinformation, provide scientific evidence, educate and motivate thousands, and achieve a truly independent 9/11 investigation with subpoena power.